[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NYT on Internet Flaws

To: [email protected] (Rich Salz)
Subject: Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
From: sameer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 21:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Rich Salz" at Oct 12, 95 00:10:49 am
Pgp-Strong-Print: 3C AE E4 00 C2 6A 81 FF 49 4E EE 0C CD CD 1D 80
Sender: [email protected]

> 
> NO!
> 
> Something like Perry's "Do not redistribute without permission" should
> be the only modification needed.

	"should" is very different from what is.
	Hell, -no- change "should" be necessary. Reporters "should" be
aware of the issues and write good articles. But they don't. Some "Do
not redistribute w/o permission" isn't going to stop a reporter from
printing an article about your post, if they think it will get them
the front page and a raise.

-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777
Community ConneXion				FAX:	 510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest")			[email protected]

References:
- Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  - From: Rich Salz <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
Next by Date: Re: SAIC bought ... [NOISE]
Prev by thread: Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
Next by thread: Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread