Cypherpunks Date Index for 1995 10




  • Re: Auto-signing
  • Linux RSA Library (fwd)
  • T-shirt on French TV
  • Re: RSA's comments on RC4 weak keys
  • Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Re: RSA's comments on RC4 weak keys
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • MITM attacks, the day after ...
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • WWW Proxy Server Vulnerabilities
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: MITM attacks, the day after ...
  • Re: WWW Proxy Server Vulnerabilities
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: Europe
  • DNS Security ( was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down...)
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • SecureDrive News - Win95, non-USA ftp sites
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: WHERE did this [NOISE] come from?
  • Quantum Crypto: Anecdote
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • N$ SSL vs M$ PCT
  • IBM enters WWW security market
  • CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • I am the anti-Ch<fnord>
  • Re: DNS Security ( was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down...)
  • More forged cancels
  • Re: Kerberos
  • Re: Europe
  • Re: SAIC in VA
  • Re: CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • Re:WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: Netscape and privacy
  • Crypto hardware summary
  • Re: Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • Spoofing HTTP server certificates
  • Re: Cryptanalysis of RC4 - Preliminary Results (Repeat)
  • Restrictions on Munitions _Imports_
  • Re: More forged cancels
  • User-Specified Trusted CAs in Netscape (Was: Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • The Free Speech Implications of Remailers
  • Re: Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • Bryn Mawr talk TODAY on Enigma and Its Effect on the Computing Age
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: Spoofing HTTP server certificates
  • Re: C2 Evaluation of Win NT (was: Hack Microsoft?)
  • Re: VISA and Microsoft STT Specs available
  • European Email Police (fwd)
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • SAI_cya
  • Re: DNS Security ( was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down...)
  • Re: Restrictions on Munitions _Imports_
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: Debt currency
  • `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • Re: X.509, S/MIME, and evolution of PGP
  • One-Time-Pad generation from audio device
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: More forged cancels (fwd)
  • Certificate proposal
  • Re: Yet Another "(Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper"
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top stor
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: Yet Another "(Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper"
  • My goof on toad.com lags...
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • NT and C2
  • List latency.
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • SSH random numbers
  • Re: CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • Time Lag (was Re: Yet Another "(Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper")
  • Re: Certificate proposal & X509 clarifications
  • Crypto APIs
  • Re: More forged cancels
  • Re: Netscape and privacy
  • Re: Crypto APIs
  • Re: Crypto APIs
  • Re: worldwide announce: New OTP Mail/FTP apps
  • Re: One-Time-Pad generation from audio device
  • Re: DNS Security ( was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down...)
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: One-Time-Pad generation from audio device
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: List latency.
  • `NOISE' what crypto is that ? [was Re: NT and C2]
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal & X509 clarifications
  • De Re ASN.1 and encoding rules ( was Re: X.509,...)
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: One-Time-Pad generation from audio device
  • re: `NOISE' what crypto is that ? [was Re: NT and C2]
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • Re: Information, We want information
  • SAIC Ideas SCI
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • SAIC Snags INFOSEC
  • Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • Re: Certificate proposal & X509 clarifications
  • Re: Time Lag
  • RNG's and time-stamps
  • Introducing Johnson-Grace
  • Re: The Free Speech Implications of Remailers
  • Re: Time Lag
  • Re: One-Time-Pad generation from audio device
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: Introducing Johnson-Grace
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • Re: Spoofing HTTP server certificates
  • Re: User-Specified Trusted CAs in Netscape (Was: Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape'sdependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: Crypto APIs
  • New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • IETF "Voluntary Access Control" working group
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • CISS TSP MISSI
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Telco Blob
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • ZIT_pus
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: CISS TSP MISSI
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*) (fwd)
  • Re: De Re ASN.1 and encoding rules ( was Re: X.509,...)
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • STT Authentication
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: X.509, S/MIME, and evolution of PGP
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Oct 14 DC-area physical meeting
  • (fwd) ETO TENDER
  • Monkeywrenching Certificate Schemes
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Keyserver keyrings
  • Re: Keyserver keyrings
  • About that simple hardware RNG
  • Oct 20th SF C'punks meeting: at the ITAR Constitutional trial court
  • meeting on 20th
  • Strong authentication for Netscape distributions
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: Keyserver keyrings
  • HUL_loo
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: HUL_loo
  • Re: Keyserver keyrings
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • NYT: WWW Usage Monitoring for Marketing
  • Article requests
  • MD4 collision
  • ARTICLES
  • ARTICLES
  • The Evolution of Cooperation (Towards a mathematical theory of reputation?)
  • Re: macworld crypto articles
  • Comments on STT Spec Implementation Details
  • Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: The Evolution of Cooperation (Towards a mathematical theory of reputation?)
  • Re: NYT: WWW Usage Monitoring for Marketing
  • New Windoze PGP Shell (freeware) worth checking out
  • Re: Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • Re: More forged cancels
  • (fwd) ETO Trade Points : Correction
  • Re: Europe
  • TidBITS article on Netscape
  • Telecommana
  • Re: New Windoze PGP Shell (freeware) worth checking out
  • [Fwd] Security Threat to Internet shopping (DT)
  • Re: Web "places" and the media monsters
  • Re: Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • FIZ_zle
  • PIZ_zaz
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: New Windoze PGP Shell (freeware) worth checking out
  • ACLU Cyber-Liberties Update 10/4
  • Re: Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • Re: About that simple hardware RNG
  • [Fwd] Security Threat to Internet shopping (DT)
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Random number generators
  • Re: `Hack Microsoft' challenge is NYT Computer News Daily's top story
  • No Subject
  • David Chaum testimony
  • CSPAN2: Copyright on the Internet
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Digest [full] version available
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • New version of my privacy enhanced www proxy is out
  • Re: New version of my privacy enhanced www proxy is out
  • Re: David Chaum testimony
  • Re: New Windoze PGP Shell (freeware) worth checking out
  • Re: David Chaum testimony
  • Re: New Windoze PGP Shell (freeware) worth checking out
  • Re: New version of my privacy enhanced www proxy is out
  • Re: Keyserver keyrings
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Re: CSPAN2: Copyright on the Internet
  • Re: CSPAN2: Copyright on the Internet
  • Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole
  • Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)
  • Re: Serious Windows TCP/IP Security Hole (fwd)
  • McNeil Lehrer on Net Insecurity
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • GSS sample/demo?
  • SAIC Bags Tier 1 Job
  • Re: GSS sample/demo?
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*) (fwd)
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: New Netscape bug (in version 1.12)
  • Mailing list
  • Re: Crypto APIs
  • NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs)
  • Macneil-Lehrer tonight.
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Simple hardware RNGs
  • $BN_air
  • xus_ORN
  • Re: Oct 14 meeting Agenda? (DC Cypherpunks)
  • Re: Oct 14 meeting Agenda ? (DC Cypherpunks)
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs)
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Announcement: keys.pgp.net
  • Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • re. GAK - (was Re: Europe)
  • Re: Elementrix Press Release
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • SSL telnet vs. SSH. Comparison?
  • Re: Restrictions on Munitions _Imports_
  • Re: Comments on STT Spec Implementation Details
  • subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • AEgis Windoze PGP Shell (with location...sorry)
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs)
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs)
  • is this a bug of Netscape
  • Oct 14 mtg - focus on java
  • NetManage & Cylink Crypto
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Digestable
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Comments on STT Spec Implementation Details
  • Re: SSL telnet vs. SSH. Comparison?
  • Secure Drive questions...
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs)
  • Re: NetManage & Cylink Crypto
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • GC Tech GlobeID pilot
  • (cpx) Mastercard, IBM, Netscape, CyberCash and GTE publish SEPP
  • Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • The Intelligence community -- some interesting web pages
  • Insiders vs. Outsiders...a Nice Metaphor
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: GC Tech GlobeID pilot
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: NetManage & Cylink Crypto
  • Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Quantum Crypto: Anecdote
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • PCMCIA Crypto
  • FON_tap
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Trust company banks on Internet
  • Re:Trust company banks on Internet
  • Re: Web "places" and the media monsters
  • Re: PCMCIA Crypto
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs)
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Where is text of wiretap bill
  • Supercomputer export ease
  • Supercomputer export ease
  • Graphic encryption
  • Re: Where is text of wiretap bill
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • National Secuirty Science and Technology Strategy
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m
  • Open Market, Inc. Announcing security products
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Open Market (more info)
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Open Market, Inc. Announcing security products
  • Transgenders begin lobbying against ITAR
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Council of Europe on Crypto: Finland
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Who knows the story on Elementrix OTP??
  • DOCKMASTER II is coming!
  • Re: Comments on STT Spec Implementation Details
  • CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts (Was: Re: Crypto APIs)
  • Microsoft encryption
  • Picking Random Primes
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • 'net freedom of speech
  • Re: Open Market, Inc. Announcing security products
  • Re: Open Market, Inc. Announcing security products
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Who knows the story on Elementrix OTP??
  • Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
  • MITM = Medusa in the Middle
  • Revised CJR
  • MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
  • Re: Microsoft encryption
  • Re: Certificates, Attributes, Web of Trust
  • Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
  • Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
  • Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
  • GET EVEN: Realm Internet Systems
  • secure split; secure device
  • Re: Where is text of wiretap bill
  • Re: Open Market, Inc. Announcing security products
  • Re: Open Market, Inc. Announcing security products
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
  • FBI intentions [Re: Where is text of wiretap bill]
  • UNA_fim
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Re: FBI intentions
  • Kerserver keyrings
  • cypherpunks digicash bank?
  • Re: Supercomputer export ease
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • European Crypto
  • Software Patents are Freezing Evolution of Products
  • Re: Revised CJR
  • HOW_ler
  • Re: Kerserver keyrings
  • NOISE eudora [was Re: Kerserver keyrings]
  • Noise: anyone experience with brain waves input devices (IBVA,...)
  • Noise: anyone experience with brain waves input devices (IBVA,...)
  • VCRplus code Algorithm
  • Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
  • Re: cypherpunks digicash bank?
  • Two bugs in CERN3.0 HTTPD
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Certification Authorities in history.
  • NEW Netscape RNG hole
  • Re: NEW Netscape RNG hole
  • Netscape 2.0 beta
  • netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Image Tape - view with Java enhanced Netscape mail reader
  • FOR_who
  • Boston Globe article
  • Re: cypherpunks digicash bank?
  • Cypherpunks in the Boston Globe
  • Re: cypherpunks digicash bank?
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: Netscape 2.0 beta
  • Re: Netscape 2.0 beta
  • Nat Sec Eco Espo
  • Re: cypherpunks digicash bank?
  • Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
  • Re: Certification Authorities in history.
  • Kerserver keyrings
  • Re: Certification Authorities in history.
  • (ecm) Chaum patent prices (was Re: cypherpunks digicash bank?)
  • [NOISE] Caution! Netscape 2.0 and Linux
  • Re: Chaum patent prices
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Re: Noise: anyone experience with brain waves input devices (IBVA,...)
  • Re: [NOISE] Caution! Netscape 2.0 and Linux
  • Re: Revised CJR
  • anonymous cash without blinding
  • Re: [NOISE] Caution! Netscape 2.0 and Linux
  • Re: NEW Netscape RNG hole
  • Calming
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Netscape 2.0 beta
  • Review: Assasins
  • Re: Netscape 2.0 beta
  • The Ultimate GUK[TM] (Globally Unique Key) Biotech Racket
  • Re: [NOISE] Caution! Netscape 2.0 and Linux
  • Java
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: cypherpunks digicash bank?
  • anonymous cash without blinding
  • Re: The Ultimate GUK[TM] (Globally Unique Key) Biotech Racket
  • Re: Certification Authorities in history.
  • Re: Certification Authorities in history.
  • Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Java
  • Nov. meeting: Austin, Tx
  • Re: Java
  • Re: Two bugs in CERN3.0 HTTPD
  • Announcing a New Offshore Financial Service (fwd)
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Java
  • Conference Summary, Part the First
  • Re: Netscape 2.0 beta
  • PGP Moose anti-spam authentication ready to go
  • Re: Netscape 2.0 beta
  • Re: Netscape 2.0 beta
  • The problem with Java
  • Question on Galois Fields
  • Re: LACC: Account sharing leads to false imprisonment
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: (cpx) Netscape 2.0 beta
  • GOB_ble
  • PC Tools' PC Secure
  • PC disk wipe software
  • Re: LACC: Account sharing leads to false imprisonment
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: LACC: Account sharing leads to false imprisonment
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • List Digest
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: Question on Galois Fields
  • Re: Rethinking the utility of netnews "cancel" control messages
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Crypto's Role in Evil? HUG_kid
  • Re: The problem with Java
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Disk Encryption Software
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • HTTP anon proxy pointers
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • java security concerns
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Software Patents are Freezing Evolution of Products
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • PC wipe utilities
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Patents etc
  • Re: PC wipe utilities
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • European Crypto
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Announcement: Alert Mailing List
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Chaum's patents
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • GISA budget: millions for cryptanalytic machine
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • java security & the cypherpunk agenda
  • Re: Java
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Software Patents are Freezing Evolution of Products
  • Re: HTTP anon proxy pointers
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: Java
  • Re: Patents etc
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: LACC: Account sharing leads to false imprisonment
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Coming Out Party!
  • Java bugs found?
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Distributed co-operative theorem proving, anyone? - was Java
  • Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time)
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Java bugs found?
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Distributed co-operative theorem proving, anyone? - was Java
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • spam detector algorithm?
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Java bugs found?
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: Java bugs found?
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: Java bugs found?
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Making it more difficult to forge cancels (was: Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m)
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Fully Qualified Domain Name
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: Java bugs found?
  • Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
  • [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • UK key escrow effort?
  • Re: java security concerns
  • PC disk wipe software - SUPERWIPE 1.04R
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: java security concerns
  • LOG_rea
  • NOD_out
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: PC disk wipe software - SUPERWIPE 1.04R
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: java security & the cypherpunk agenda
  • Java idea
  • Re: Conference Summary, Part the First
  • Re: Distributed co-operative theorem proving, anyone? - was Java
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Java
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Distributed co-operative theorem proving, anyone? - was Java
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Java=?
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • William S. Powell in front of Congress Oct 11, 10:30 AM
  • Myth of the Powerless State
  • rise and fall...
  • My Last Message
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • truth in advertising: Netscape 1.1 on security
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail...
  • Re: Chaum's patents
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Baltimore security conference, opening session
  • Re: Making it more difficult to forge cancels (was: Re: FORGED CANCELS of posts on n.a.n-a.m)
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: Java idea
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Netscape starts their own "Hack Netscape" contest
  • How to hold a key signing party?
  • Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: How to hold a key signing party?
  • How to hold a key signing party?
  • Netscape Crack
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: Netscape Crack
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: NSA Realists v. Nuts
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: truth in advertising: Netscape 1.1 on security
  • recent crime bill
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: Graphic encryption
  • Int'l Money Laundering, Part the Second
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: spam detector algorithm?
  • Re: Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time)
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: truth in advertising: Netscape 1.1 on security
  • Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: The Ultimate GUK[TM] (Globally Unique Key) Biotech Racket
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Banque des Cypherpunks
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: How to hold a key signing party?
  • MITM garbage
  • Re: PC disk wipe softwar
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time)
  • Re: PC disk wipe softwar
  • Internet, the cracking machine
  • Elementrix POTP
  • MITM evasionMITM evasion
  • Re: Elementrix POTP
  • PKP Lawsuit progress report
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Checksums for current release versions of Netscape Navigator
  • Checksums for current beta versions of Netscape Navigator
  • NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: MITM evasion
  • Enigma
  • Graphic encryption and XV
  • Type2.list/pubring.mix
  • Open Mkt Sudden Infant Death
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Graphic encryption and XV
  • Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns
  • Re: [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns
  • Public Awarreness of Security
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Mean Men in the Middle
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: spam detector algorithm?
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: Hal's Third Challenge?
  • Re: Elementrix POTP
  • Re: Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time)
  • No Subject
  • Re: PKP Lawsuit progress report
  • Re: Man in the Middle Revisited (but not for the last time)
  • Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • [Noise] FWD:Want to trade UNIX skills for Laissez Faire Books?
  • Re: java security concerns
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: Elementrix POTP
  • Re: Internet, the cracking machine
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • "Denial of Clueless Service" Attacks
  • Re: Banque des Cypherpunks
  • Re: Banque des Cypherpunks
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Elementrix POTP
  • IMPORTANT: Valhalla is leaving alias.net domain!!
  • On export restrictions and the NYT/Internet Commerece
  • Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Updated Key for Valhalla
  • Re: Announcement: Alert Mailing List
  • Re: MITM garbage
  • Re: Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce
  • FWD>sig du crypt
  • Pointer to 10/9/95 EE Times Article
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Checksums for current beta versions of Netscape Navigator
  • regulation of money transmitters
  • Re: MITM evasion MITM evasion
  • CoCom and Crypto Export
  • Re: Banque des Cypherpunks
  • Re: BoS: Re: Netscape & Fortessa
  • Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
  • international clampdown on money laundering
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Banque des Cypherpunks
  • Re: Checksums for current beta versions of Netscape Navigator
  • anonymous web pages?
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • Re: Elementrix POTP
  • Re: anonymous web pages?
  • Noise: Re: CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Check by phone (revisited)
  • Final Roster/Reminder -- Bionomics Conference (fwd)
  • Re: Elementrix Press Release
  • netscape rewards bug finders
  • Re: Elementrix Press Release
  • variations on an attack
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
  • Re: Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: anonymous web pages?
  • Re: anonymous web pages?
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: SAIC bought ... [NOISE]
  • Re: Noise: Re: CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Noise: Re: CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • Cypherpunks Moderated: Avoid This Thread
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Judicial Access to Keys (Was: Re: Banque des Cypherpunks)
  • SUPERWIPE pgp a / uuencode
  • Re: Noise: Re: CJR for perl-RSA t-shirt
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Follow-up to sci.crypt posting that prompted NYT article
  • Internet holes
  • Re: [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns
  • Re: [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns
  • Re: MITM evasion MITM evasion
  • Re: [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • RSA Data Security, Inc. To Exclusively License Rights to RSA
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: PC disk wipe software
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Pointer to 10/9/95 EE Times Article
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Markoff (was: NYT on Internet Flaws)
  • Aquaria wars ?
  • Commercialism on Cypherpunks
  • responce to graphic encryption replies
  • Privsoft
  • Re: RSA Data Security, Inc. To Exclusively License Rights to RSA
  • IDEA algorithm
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: RSA Data Security, Inc. To Exclusively License Rights to RSA
  • Oct 14 meeting, focus on Java, Mountain View, California
  • Cylink license fees
  • (no subject)
  • (fwd) checkfree/cybercash diff
  • Re: java security concerns
  • smartcard encryption: revised paper available
  • Re: Oct 14 meeting, focus on Java, Mountain View, California
  • Re: (fwd) checkfree/cybercash diff
  • FWD: International Encryption Protocols
  • Identity database, another attempt...
  • Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Smart Card Target
  • Netscape 2.0b1J still core dumps on Java
  • netscape 2 certification authorities
  • http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~raph/javatest.html
  • Re: Identity database, another attempt...
  • Re: netscape 2 certification authorities
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: GOB_ble
  • Re: netscape 2 certification authorities
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Netscape beta 2.0
  • Re: IDEA algorithm
  • Re: IDEA algorithm
  • Security
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b1J still core dumps on Java
  • Re: Netscape beta 2.0
  • T-Shirts
  • Re: IDEA algorithm
  • Re: T-Shirts
  • 90%
  • Re: 90%
  • [NOISE] Re: Aquaria wars ?
  • Re: 90%
  • Flame Wars
  • Serial port radiation detector?
  • Re: Smart Card Target
  • Majordomo & PGP
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • hardware
  • Welcome to the list
  • The Economist on Netscape "hackers"
  • looking for anti-tamper software
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: Netscape beta 2.0
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: T-Shirts
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: Welcome to the list
  • Re: Flame Wars
  • Re: Netscape beta 2.0
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b1J still core dumps on Java
  • Who has Copies of the "Internet Handbook"
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: Flame Wars
  • what are these people selling????
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: T-Shirts
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Re: The Economist on Netscape "hackers"
  • Re: looking for anti-tamper software
  • NYT Markoff Article and one person's response
  • Insecurity Section of the Internet Handbook
  • Re: The Economist on Netscape "hackers"
  • OneTimePasswd (not Pad)
  • FT on IT Standards
  • Re: Identity database, another attempt...
  • Re: IDEA algorithm
  • Re: Insecurity Section of the Internet Handbook
  • Re: OneTimePasswd (not Pad)
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: The Economist on Netscape "hackers"
  • Re: Judicial Access to Keys (Was: Re: Banque des Cypherpunks)
  • Re: netscape 2 certification authorities
  • re: anti-tamper software
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • NNTP holes paper updated thatnks to Rich Salz
  • Re: Insecurity Section of the Internet Handbook
  • Who is liable under ITAR (was Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting)
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Bugs Bounty?? ... shhh ... I'm huntin wa'bits ...
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Re: IDEA algorithm
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Exporting Mental States
  • proposal: "security spectrum scale" (SSS)
  • CYPHERPUNKS EXPOSED
  • Netscape question transformed
  • Same ol' massive MITM exposure in Netscape 2.01b
  • Re: Exporting Mental States
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • CAT_sho
  • thanx
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: Cypherpunks "Exposed"
  • applications
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • early anonymous remailer
  • New PA law (????)
  • mental cryptography
  • Re: Exporting Mental States
  • Yes, indeed the PA law is for real!
  • [NOISE] Re: applications
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b1J still core dumps on Java
  • Re: CYPHERPUNKS EXPOSED
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • cryptp & PCMCIA committee mtg notes
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: Netscape beta 2.0 [NOISE]
  • Re: List of reliable remailers
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Re: applications
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: Same ol' massive MITM exposure in Netscape 2.01b
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • AP on trashing/computer fraud ring
  • Guess what I found...
  • Re: Identity database, another attempt...
  • airport security
  • Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • The incredible bouncing mailbox (was Re: mental cryptography)
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Yes, indeed the PA law is for real!
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b1J still core dumps on Java
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • [URGENT] Where are we meeting today?
  • Re: [URGENT] Where are we meeting today?
  • DSS patent license
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • Top Math & Physics Sites (fwd)
  • [noise] Re: Identity database, another attempt...
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • ESP_ion
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: airport security
  • Where to Get PGP
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Macintosh [and perhaps other OS] Security Alert
  • Re: Anguilla Cypherpunks Meeting
  • Re: applications
  • Re: Yes, indeed the PA law is for real!
  • Re: [noise] Re: Identity database, another attempt...
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Idea Futures
  • Karl Hess - L.A. area meeting
  • TSB_pbs
  • Re: Idea Futures
  • Re: Cybersecurity
  • DUM_not
  • bouncing mail
  • Re: Yes, indeed the PA law is for real!
  • No Subject
  • ORW_lea
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • National Insitute of Justice
  • I am looking for a way to create a zombie process
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Int'l Money Laundering, Part the Second
  • Re: Cybersecurity
  • Re: WWW> One If By Congress, Two If By White House
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Idea Futures
  • Re: Yes, indeed the PA law is for real!
  • Re: I am looking for a way to create a zombie process
  • Crypto & Taxes [WAS Re: Cybersecurity]
  • (fwd) CyberSpace Detective Agency
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Guess what I found...
  • Re: Crypto & Taxes [WAS Re: Cybersecurity]
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • called as juror (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: Crypto & Taxes [WAS Re: Cybersecurity]
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: Yes, indeed the PA law is for real!
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Crypto & Taxes [WAS Re: Cybersecurity]
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Netscape bugs bounty
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Crypto & Taxes [WAS Re: Cybersecurity]
  • JOin List request - help please
  • Re: I am looking for a way to create a zombie process
  • Re: what are these people selling????
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Undeliverable Message
  • Re: Crypto & Taxes [WAS Re: Cybersecurity]
  • Illegally canceled articles on Microsoft Security Bugs
  • Next EFF-Austin General Meeting : Cryptography (fwd)
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns (and one very stupid joke)
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Why commercial key escrow? [Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger]
  • Re: Illegally canceled articles on Microsoft Security Bugs
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • "Corporatocracy"
  • alt.paranoia.pgp.ban: long rerun (was Re: My chat with...)
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Bug Bounty [noise]
  • Forged cancels of posts critical of Microsoft, *apparently* through internetmci.com or nasa.gov
  • RE: robo remailerRE: robo remailer
  • transaction costs in anonymous markets
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns
  • MUZ_zle
  • Four Horsemen (was Re: PA Remailer Concerns)
  • Japan-CIA
  • PGP out of RAM
  • was: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Weekly MixMaster list
  • Re: Why commercial key escrow? [Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger]
  • Re: [NOISE] PGP out of RAM
  • OS$ Hackwork
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
  • Re: robo remailer
  • The NSA Visits Compendium
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • [Honk] FR $ec vs US $ec
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • Re: NEW Netscape RNG hole
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: proposal: "security spectrum scale" (SSS)
  • Let's refocus... (was Re: Netscape rewards are an insult)
  • Digital Cash The Book
  • Human ID through insecure channel
  • Re: proposal: "security spectrum scale" (SSS)
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • NSA crypto museum article
  • Re: Weekly MixMaster list
  • Cardinal Wins Okay for First Online Bank
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Re: Bug Bounty [noise]
  • Using deterministic programs to select private RSA keys.
  • Security Spectra
  • PGP article in American Survival Guide
  • Re: Bug Bounty [noise]
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Elementrix Press Release
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • Empennage Seminar -- Sun Microsystems
  • Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
  • Seminar
  • java flaw
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • Re: Weekly MixMaster list
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Re: java flaw
  • Re: mental cryptography
  • Re: Security Spectra
  • Duress codes
  • Re: java flaw
  • Re: java flaw
  • NOT_100
  • Re: Using deterministic programs to select private RSA keys.
  • DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash
  • San Diego Cypherpunks Physical Meeting
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: 90%
  • Re: San Diego Cypherpunks Physical Meeting
  • BeBox Security Hole?
  • e$: Reuters Smells the Coffee
  • re: e$: Reuters Smells the Coffee
  • Yardley's 1st ed. "Black Chamber" $25+
  • [[email protected]: NSA recommendation on CAPIs]
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Blacknet
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash
  • Re: Yardley's 1st ed. "Black Chamber" $25+
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash
  • Re: Using deterministic programs to select private RSA keys.
  • Re: java flaw
  • Re: My chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash
  • if-comp: Project to make Fact true (fwd)
  • Re: Security Spectra (Oops)
  • Re: if-comp: Project to make Fact true (fwd)
  • [ANNOUNCEMENT] eCash reality !!
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] eCash reality !!
  • PINs
  • Re: proposal: "security spectrum scale" (SSS)
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • I want to learn!
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • Truth serum, tuition & Re: PINs
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Netscape whining virus, was Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • A comment about Netscape 2 and certifictes
  • Re: A comment about Netscape 2 and certifictes
  • Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
  • The Anonymous Bounty Claim
  • Re: Netscape whining virus
  • I want to learn!
  • Re: The Anonymous Bounty Claim
  • Re: Netscape whining virus
  • Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
  • Postscript in Netscape
  • Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Microsoft: WFW & Win95 TCP/IP is insecure, and alleged serious computer crime
  • Re: Netscape PR
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: I want to learn!
  • ABA Draft Digital Signature Guidelines Open for Comment
  • Re: I want to learn!
  • Re: I want to learn!
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash
  • Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Digital Signature Guidelines
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: I want to learn! [NOISE]
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: I want to learn!
  • Re: YOUR chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Digital Signature Guidelines
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: YOUR chat with Goeff Greiveldinger
  • Munition Code?
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • This PROMISes to be odius
  • Oh to be a mouse in the corner...
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • the beverage you are about to drink
  • Tales from Tech Support
  • Smoking gun invalidates crypto patent
  • Legal argument invalidates Merkle-Hellman
  • Brief Rant (Re: Oh to be a mouse in the corner...)
  • (buyinfo Req:) Stored value card alliances?
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Brief Rant (Re: Oh to be a mouse in the corner...)
  • Media Accuracy
  • [NOISE] Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: the beverage you are about to drink
  • Re: Tales from Tech Support
  • Motherload of Crypto Site...
  • perl-RSA CJ request sent today
  • [NOISE] Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • Re: 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • Re: 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • (no subject)
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • [NOISE] Re: 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • Re: 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • Re: Media Accuracy
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: San Diego Cypherpunks Physical Meeting
  • Cypherpunks in Sydney (Australia)
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: java flaw
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • REMINDER: SF Federal Building, Oct 20, 1015AM: Bernstein case
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash (fwd)
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • crypto export from the UK
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: MKE Threat Assessments
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: crypto export from the UK
  • SciAm Bye-Byes Privacy
  • Re: REMINDER: SF Federal Building, Oct 20, 1015AM: Bernstein case
  • STT - useable in real life ?
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash (fwd)
  • SciAm's Crypto Stego Pushup
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • Re: STT - useable in real life ?
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Oppenheimer Quote Regarding Government Secrecy and Public Policy
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • ABA guidelines no longer read-only
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: SciAm Bye-Byes Privacy
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: REMINDER: SF Federal Building, Oct 20, 1015AM: Bernstein case
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: REMINDER: SF Federal Building, Oct 20, 1015AM: Bernstein case
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash (fwd)
  • Errors in the Cyphernomicon FAQ
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Oh to be a mouse in the corner...
  • Re: This PROMISes to be odius
  • [NOISE], period
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Tabling Results for Primes Considered Hard
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: airport security
  • textbooks
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • Re: crypto export from the UK
  • Polymorphic e-cash schemes was: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: SciAm Bye-Byes Privacy
  • Re: Postscript and 50 ways [MAJOR NOISE] [long]
  • Re: Motherload of Crypto Site...
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: REMINDER: SF Federal Building, Oct 20, 1015AM: Bernstein case
  • Re: textbooks
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: DalSemi: Add-Only Memory for Storage of Digital Cash (fwd)
  • Java power
  • [NOISE] Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult [NOISE]
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • PGPfone and (?) boxes
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • How was the Federal thing?
  • Re: airport security
  • Ginetta Sagan to give Jing Lyman Lecture at Stanford
  • PARTY! Nov. 18th, sponsored by Community ConneXion
  • Re: airport security
  • ANSI to work on e-payment -- first meeting coming up
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • old doc cohen
  • Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • Re: 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: [META-NOISE] W3
  • PGP interface for Mac--well...
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Dr. Fred
  • Re: Polymorphic e-cash schemes was: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: 1(800)MY-ANI-IS
  • Denver area meeting, SUNDAY, 10/22, 2 pm
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Verisign and MITM
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: Postscript and 50 ways [MAJOR NOISE] [long]
  • Re: Postscript in Netscape
  • "power one time pad"
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • Re: responce to graphic encryption replies
  • _Digital Cash_ info...
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Re: 50 attacks on Netscape - please send the check
  • Re: PGP interface for Mac--well...
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Job Openings at Consensus (Mostly RSAREF related)
  • Re: textbooks
  • The Dr. Fred scandal
  • Automatic File Wipe Utils for Win95?
  • Voicemail Security
  • Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
  • The trial of the century?
  • Re: textbooks
  • Lack of secrecy in U.S. Banks
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • faxes are not secure
  • Challenge: Hack Elementrix!
  • Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
  • Re: Java power
  • Re: textbooks
  • Java good for security? (was: 50 ways...)
  • M$ Windows 95 swap files, disk recovery & PGP
  • Article on Digital Cash in "Worth"
  • No Subject
  • ADMIN: Cypherpunks list meltdown, temporary delay in postings
  • FidoNet Remailer
  • WinNews Special Issue (fwd)
  • Sun speaks out - but not to the cypherpunks
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: Challenge: Hack Elementrix!
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: Verisign and MITM
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: faxes are not secure
  • Re: Challenge: Hack Elementrix!
  • Re: Polymorphic e-cash schemes was: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: Verisign and MITM
  • Re: crypto export from the UK
  • Re: Java power
  • Re: Verisign and MITM
  • bernstein results?
  • big bust
  • Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: "power one time pad"
  • Re: bernstein results?
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • experimental socks5 gateway
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Sun speaks out - but not to the cypherpunks
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • No Subject
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Reducing the Flames, Attacks, and Nit-Pickings
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: Reducing the Flames, Attacks, and Nit-Pickings
  • Re: airport security
  • S.F. judge to rule on encoding software
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Lack of secrecy in U.S. Banks
  • BlackNet in "Hardware"
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: BlackNet in "Hardware"
  • Mondex vs. Digicash (was: Godzilla vs. Mothra)
  • Remailer-in-a-Box, Everyone a Remailer
  • Re: airport security
  • Interesting Newsletter - GSSN Oct 1995
  • Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: BlackNet in "Hardware" (fwd)
  • request for binary: ec211u16.exe
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: airport security
  • How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Real ECash from Mark Twain Bank
  • hot news at DigiCash
  • Re: Mondex vs. Digicash (was: Godzilla vs. Mothra)
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • (Fwd) DIGITAL CASH IN AN ELECTRONIC WORLD
  • Re: textbooks
  • Mark Twain Bank Launches Ecash
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Digicash for-real announcement
  • Re: Reducing the Flames, Attacks, and Nit-Pickings
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: WinNews Special Issue (fwd)
  • Re: Reducing the Flames, Attacks, and Nit-Pickings
  • Chaum's cash: backup?
  • Re: Chaum's cash: backup?
  • Freeh wants to wiretap millions
  • digicash & unix clients
  • Re: Chaum's cash: backup?
  • Re: digicash & unix clients
  • Microsoft "Encrypted" Documents Hack FYI
  • Re: digicash & unix clients
  • Re: Re: Chaum's cash: backup?
  • No Subject
  • Re: Netscape question transformed
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: FidoNet Remailer
  • Re: require for new remailer list tag?
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • CSP
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: crypto export from the UK
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: require for new remailer list tag?
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: textbooks
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: "power one time pad"
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • COMMUNITY CONNEXION TO OFFER REWARD FOR REVEALING HOLES IN ECASH
  • Re: CSP
  • Re: Mondex vs. Digicash (was: Godzilla vs. Mothra)
  • Re: FidoNet Remailer
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Saudi Arabia?
  • Quantum Computation article
  • EPIC Alert 2.12 (Wiretap regs, funding, FLIR)
  • FV -- What we have learned
  • [NOISE] Re: CSP
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • COMMUNITY CONNEXION TO OFFER REWARD FOR REVEALING HOLES IN ECASH
  • Rising Sun Postscript Code
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: Digest Version Changes Hosts
  • Re: airport security
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • Re: This PROMISes to be odius
  • Re: Sun speaks out - but not to the cypherpunks
  • Info: Elementrix POTP
  • Internet Security Review
  • (Fwd) DIGITAL CASH IN AN ELECTRONIC WORLD -Reply
  • Re: "power one time pad"
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Internet Security Review
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Internet Security Review
  • bank wiretapping law
  • A secure cryptosystem with a 40-bit key?
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Hacking Digicash (was: Article on Digital Cash in "Worth")
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: Re: Chaum's cash: backup?
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Similar Lists
  • Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: Info: Elementrix POTP
  • Re: Reducing the Flames, Attacks, and Nit-Pickings
  • Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal) (fwd)
  • (fwd) WebNet-96 CFP (San Francisco)
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: PA Remailer Concerns
  • Re: Hacking Digicash (was: Article on Digital Cash in "Worth")
  • Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
  • pkcs7 examples
  • Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal) (fwd)
  • Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
  • Verification of Registration
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: FidoNet Remailer
  • FidoNet Remailer
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: crypto export from the UK
  • Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Re: crypto export from the UK
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal) (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • Re[2]: Verification of Registration
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • Re: Re[2]: Verification of Registration
  • C|Net
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: Internet Security Review
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Hacking commercial systems.
  • Re: Re: Reformated: How secure....
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Re: Certificate proposal
  • robo remailer
  • Bankers Trust Frand Story
  • Re: The NSA Visits Compendium
  • Mondex flaws? Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: Remailer-in-a-Box, Everyone a Remailer
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • encryption products
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: Hacking commercial systems.
  • Re: Netscape rewards are an insult
  • Does your software?
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Fred, Fred, Fred: Enough already!
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • Welcome to c|net
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Re: Reformated: How secure....
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Returned mail: unknown mailer error 2
  • Re: C|Net
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: subjective names and MITM
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • What is needed for S/MIME remailer ?
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Weekly Type-II Remailer List
  • Re: Does your software?
  • 80 bit security from 40 bit exportable products
  • Attacks on Products and Companies
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Hash collisions [was Re: MD5 weakness ? ...]
  • Re: Welcome to c|net
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • Re: C|Net
  • Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • (fwd) Chaum vs. Stein
  • Re: Sun speaks out - but not to the cypherpunks
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Re: 80 bit security from 40 bit exportable products
  • No Subject
  • MD5 concerns, was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: What is needed for S/MIME remailer ?
  • Elementrix's so-called "Power One Time Pad"
  • Re: What is needed for S/MIME remailer ?
  • USA Today Against ITAR & GAK
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • CRYPTO '96 CFP
  • Pointer to article on ex parte search & sezure
  • Re: textbooks
  • 80 bits from 40 bits -- NOT
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • The cost of ITAR
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: Does your software?
  • [NOISE] Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Re: Reformated: How secure....
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: What is needed for S/MIME remailer ?
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: Verification of Registration
  • BlackNet Meets Stanford Law School
  • Get rid of this stuff, please...
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Re: 80 bit security from 40 bit exportable products
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: textbooks
  • Quick commercial package question
  • Conference Report?
  • Re: textbooks
  • Re: Quick commercial package question
  • QUERY: dc-nets list?
  • re: Remailer-in-a-Box, Everyone a Remailer
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: Quick commercial package question
  • CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: Quick commercial package question
  • Re: Quick commercial package question
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Quick commercial package question
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: A secure cryptosystem with a 40-bit key?
  • Re: CJR returned to sender [NOISE][Noise][noise]
  • Froomkin papers (Was: BlackNet Meets Stanford Law School)
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • IT View of Worldwide Electronic Commerce Conference
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: IT View of Worldwide Electronic Commerce Conference
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • The real value of munition t-shirts (Re: CJR returned to sender)
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • RE: 80 bits from 40 bits -- NOT
  • RE: textbooks
  • RE: Pointer to article on ex parte searc
  • RE: MD5 concerns, was Re: Netscape Logic
  • RE: CRYPTO '96 CFP
  • RE: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • RE: USA Today Against ITAR & GAK
  • RE: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared
  • RE: What is needed for S/MIME remailer ?
  • RE: 80 bit security from 40 bit exportab
  • RE: What is needed for S/MIME remailer ?
  • RE: No Subject
  • RE: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Log
  • RE: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Log
  • RE: (fwd) Chaum vs. Stein
  • RE: Sun speaks out - but not to the cyph
  • Re: Does your software?
  • RE: Verification of Registration
  • RE: Hash collisions [was Re: MD5 weaknes
  • RE: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Log
  • RE: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Log
  • RE: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • RE: Does your software?
  • RE: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slan
  • RE: Weekly Type-II Remailer List
  • RE: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Re: Does your software?
  • RE: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Log
  • Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Does your software?
  • BSDC: Designing Systems for Electronic Commerce
  • CNN Interactive Internet privacy interview
  • Re: airport security
  • Mandatory ID in California?
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Does your software?
  • Re: Mandatory ID in California?
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: A secure cryptosystem with a 40-bit key?
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Does your software?
  • [NOISE] Re: BlackNet in "Hardware"
  • Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Re: textbooks
  • Re: Reformated: How secure....
  • crypto and law enforcement
  • Re: Quick commercial package question
  • arg
  • Re: Reformated: How secure....
  • Re: arg
  • (www-b) (fwd) Privacy Marketing
  • Re: Quick commercial package question
  • Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Welcome to cypherpunks
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank (was: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal)
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Public key Steganography?
  • Re: Privacy Marketing
  • Re: Mandatory ID in California?
  • Payments FAQ
  • Re: Re: Reformated: How secure....
  • [ADMIN] Re: Welcome to cypherpunks
  • CTCP
  • Digital Cash, Privacy, Anonymity, Double spending protection and Cheating protection
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank [good news]
  • E-mail Spy
  • Re: Welcome to cypherpunks
  • ACLU Cyber-Liberties Update
  • Re: DigiCash
  • The real value of munition t-shirts (Re:
  • Re: [ADMIN] Re: Welcome to cypherpunks
  • Re: Crypto's Role in Evil?
  • Privacy Marketing
  • symmetric key algorithms
  • Re: A secure cryptosystem with a 40-bit key?
  • Let's Not Merge Mailing Lists, OK?
  • Re: Mandatory ID in California?
  • Re: Welcome to cypherpunks
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: E-mail Spy
  • Your Majordomo request results
  • Welcome to cypherpunks
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Linux security issues
  • [Noise] Paranoia in the Comics
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Mandatory ID in California?
  • Bill Gates on anonymity
  • Re: Mandatory ID in California?
  • Linux security issues
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: sepp-talk mailing list
  • FBI/CIA/NSA, let's merge them all into one. [???!!!]
  • Re: Let's Not Merge Mailing Lists, OK?
  • Re: [Noise] Paranoia in the Comics
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Anonymous Account Help
  • Re: [Noise] Paranoia in the Comics
  • MD4-derived hash functions
  • HTTP Request-Header & Server Environment Echoes
  • Re: Welcome to cypherpunks
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Fred, Fred, Fred: Enough already!
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Welcome to cypherpunks
  • Re: Anonymous Account Help
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re:NEVER MIND - Anonymous Account Help
  • Re: 80 bit security from 40 bit exportable products
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: [Noise] Perrynoia in the Comics
  • Re: MD4-derived hash functions
  • RE: Let's Not Merge Mailing Lists, OK?
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Digitial Money [SHAMELESS PLUG FOR BOOK]
  • I resubmitted the CJR
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: rejection of CJR
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Diane Rehm Show just ended
  • Usenet: pseudonymity's killer app
  • MD5 and ITAR questions
  • [Dr. Fred] [FRED] (was: Re: Fred, Fred, Fred: Enough already!)
  • Re: Anonymous Account Help
  • Re: DigiCash
  • No Subject
  • Re: rejection of CJR
  • A real payoff of the export-SSL bruting.
  • Re: HTTP Request-Header & Server Environment Echoes
  • Re: symmetric key algorithms
  • Re: [Noise] Perrynoia in the Comics
  • Re: A secure cryptosystem with a 40-bit key?
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • idle CPU markets
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank's DigiCash offer
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank's DigiCash offer
  • Re: idle CPU markets
  • Re: One Time Pad encryption over the Internet, securely? (fwd)
  • The Unofficial "PGP" Icon / Logo
  • Re: Mandatory ID in California?
  • Re: MD4-derived hash functions
  • COS_sec
  • PIS_tst
  • SPI_bux
  • CAS_bah
  • Re: Usenet: pseudonymity's killer app
  • RE: Let's Not Merge Mailing Lists, OK?
  • Re: idle CPU markets
  • Re: idle CPU markets
  • type trapz...
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Re: Linux security issues
  • pub key expert wanted
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Mail to News gateways
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Testing... Is this thing turned on?
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: idle CPU markets
  • Re: idle CPU markets
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Mondex keeps records
  • Re: Linux security issues
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • e-mail, business and privicy
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: HTTP Request-Header & Server Environment Echoes
  • TWP Ups Net Freedom
  • FTP export walls
  • Re: e-mail, business and privicy
  • Diffie-Hellman Key Generation
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank's DigiCash offer
  • Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
  • Re: Linux security issues
  • Re: Linux security issues
  • PRZ On Mitchells
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: e-mail, business and privicy
  • Re: e-mail, business and privicy
  • QUB_ity
  • Children's Rooms at Libraries Need Regulation
  • New release of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: New release of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • Re: New release of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • Electric Communities (was: COS_sec)
  • Rabin Patents.
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Need Mail-to-News gates
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Re: Need Mail-to-News gates
  • groupware position available in Boston
  • POINTER: The Money Laundromat
  • DigiCrime web page
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  • Re: Need Mail-to-News gates
  • SSL Remailer interface w/premail
  • Re: Mark Twain Bank's DigiCash offer
  • EE Times on IDEA
  • Re: Diffie-Hellman Key Generation
  • S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
  • Returned mail: warning: cannot send message for 4 hours (fwd)
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
  • Re: Linux security issues
  • Re: digital cash and identity disclosure
  • Re: 50 attacks... [NOISE]
  • Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  • Re: Electric Communities (was: COS_sec)
  • Re: New release of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: New release of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • Re: MD4-derived hash functions
  • Re: MD4-derived hash functions
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Re: New release of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • 1995-10-27 Members Named to Nat Security Telecom Committee (fwd)
  • Re: Need Mail-to-News gates
  • Conference in Eugene, OR - 11/3 and 11/4
  • Technology: The Great Deregulator
  • Re: Human ID through insecure channel
  • Re: New release of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • ques. regd. STT
  • RE: Hash collisions [was Re: MD5 weaknes
  • Digicash will not fly
  • Austin E-Commerce Conf -- BOF?
  • Re: EE Times on IDEA
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Quebec Libre
  • Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  • [noise] Re: Quebec Libre
  • Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
  • Re: EE Times on IDEA
  • Re: MD4-derived hash functions
  • QUF_jpg
  • Re: newsweek oct 30 Levy digital cash article
  • Re: MD4-derived hash functions
  • Re: MD4-derived hash functions
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Important Digital Cash Question...
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Cuban Security Conference
  • Re: Important Digital Cash Question...
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Re: Pinkerton Risk Assessment & "Security 2000"
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Re: Important Digital Cash Question...
  • Re: Cuban Security Conference
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Re: Pinkerton Risk Assessment & "Security 2000"
  • I-D ACTION:draft-eastlake-cybercash-v08-01.txt
  • Re: Important Digital Cash Question...
  • Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
  • DOD_com
  • /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Cuban Security Conference
  • Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Don't Kill the Messenger--A New Slant on Remailers
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Important Digital Cash Question...
  • [[email protected]: MIT TOC SEMINAR--DAN BONEH--Thursday, November 2--4:15pm!!]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Digicash will not fly (not)
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Keyed-MD5, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
  • Article on PGP (Noise)
  • Pinkerton Risk Assessment & "Security 2000"
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Cuban Security Conference
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Copy Protection Schemes
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • FWD: Electronic Warfare (from the digitaliberty list)
  • Using Holographic Memory Crystals for Encryption
  • Digicash on Scientific American
  • Turing Award
  • Smart Snoops
  • Virtual Security Jitters
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • payee anonymity
  • Re: Cuban Security Conference
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • ecash remailer
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: ecash remailer
  • Re: payee anonymity
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Four Horsemen (was Re: PA Remailer Concerns)
  • Re: ecash remailer
  • RE: This PROMISes to be odius
  • PGP 2.6.2 signator replacement bug fix
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Nautullus Voice Encryption
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: ecash remailer
  • RE: CJR RETURNED TO SENDER
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • InfoWar
  • Re: FCPUNX:Macintosh [and perhaps other OS] Security Alert (fwd)
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Cryto article in SJ Mercenary
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Need Mail-to-News gates
  • A final Huber-Spam: ON MONEY
  • Re: InfoWar
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: PGP 2.6.2 signator replacement bug fix
  • PGP On shared machines (was Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG)
  • Perfect Forward Secrecy - is it worth it?
  • Re: InfoWar
  • Electronic Warfare
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Need Mail-to-News gates
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Please send cash
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare
  • There is still no perfectly anonymous currency
  • Re: /dev/random for FreeBSD [was: Re: /dev/random for Linux]
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: Please send cash
  • Re: CJR returned to sender
  • Re: IBM's Microkernal
  • Re: Digicash on Scientific American
  • Re: Please send cash
  • Re: Important Digital Cash Question...
  • Re: ecash remailer
  • Internet World Boston
  • Re: PGP at Universities
  • W3 Self-Regulation?
  • If I WANNA I'M GONNA
  • Re: ecash remailer
  • Re: Important Digital Cash Question...
  • Re: W3 Self-Regulation?
  • Digicash tagged with payee?
  • "Dr." Fred
  • Re: Keyed-MD5, ITAR, and HTTP-NG
  • Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
  • Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare
  • Happy Halloween!
  • PRL_har
  • Re: ecash remailer
  • DIR_ty$
  • Re: ecash remailer
  • [crypto-philo]OTP or DES?
  • No Subject
  • No Subject

  • Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.3