Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal

[Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>]

Futplex wrote:

| The fundamental conflict, as I see it, is this: 
| For security reasons, we want messages to be distributed to a very wide
| audience, although those messages are only of interest to a very narrow
| audience. News admins understandably are generally inclined to accept
| bandwidth only in proportion to readership. For practical reasons, they don't
| want to carry messages to people who aren't interested in them. It's not
| easy to convince the news admins to do it anyway out of altruism.

	How about a local group, such as ucb.anonymous?  Those news
admins who wanted it could get it.  Not perfect, but reduced
polyticks, increased usablity.

Adam


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume