[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal

To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
From: [email protected] (Futplex)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 05:30:39 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Tom Weinstein" at Oct 19, 95 01:48:17 am
Reply-To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Sender: [email protected]

Tom Weinstein writes:
> A simple addition to the remailer protocol would be
> to encrypt the message and the control information seperately.  This
> would allow the sender of a message to provide a pre-packaged method for
> returning a reply.  The recipient of the original message could then
> just blindly send his reply to the starting point remailer specified in
> the original message by tacking the pre-packaged routing information on
> to the front of his message.

Congratulations, you have reinvented what we usually call "reply blocks". 
See the archives and some remailer help files & web pages.

-Futplex <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  - From: [email protected] (Tom Weinstein)

Prev by Date: Re: airport security
Next by Date: Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape
Prev by thread: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
Next by thread: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread