[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Internet Security Review

To: [email protected]
Subject: Internet Security Review
From: Connie Sadler <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 15:24:41 -0800 (PST)
A1-Type: MAIL
Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
Hop-Count: 1
Importance: normal
Mr-Received: by mta REN; Relayed; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 23:24:57 -0800
Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 15:24:00 -0800 (PST)
Priority: normal
Sender: [email protected]
Ua-Content-Id: C120ZVZQM0OYB
X400-Mts-Identifier: [;75423232015991/592222@REN]

Subject: Internet Security Review
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 15:20:23 PST
A1-type: DOCUMENT
Importance: normal


>Just got a copy via mail today. Boy, Dorothy Denning seriously dings
>Tim May in this issue. Interesting reading to know what the other side
>is up to nonetheless. She uses some reasoning that will be compelling to
>many.

>Doug Hughes				Engineering Network Services
>[email protected]			Auburn University

Doug,

Could you possibly expand on this a little bit? I don't usually see this
publication.

Thanks!

Connie

Prev by Date: Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
Next by Date: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
Prev by thread: Internet Security Review
Next by thread: Re: Internet Security Review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread