[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
From: [email protected] (Anonymous)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 23:23:42 +0100
Comments: Hack-Tic may or may not approve of the content of this posting
Comments: Please report misuse of this automated remailing service to <[email protected]>
Organization: Hack-Tic International, Inc.
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Tatu Ylonen ([email protected]) wrote:
> You are aware that RSADSI claims they have exclusive licensing rights
> for DSA?

You are aware that Bidzos is full of shit?

Roger Schafly (sp?) addresses this issue in his lawsuit.  Hopefully this 
will be resolved soon.  The only problem is that Bidzo has made this claim 
on patents in other countries, not just USA, so he'd probably have to be 
sued throughout Europe also...  He sure does do a good job of making 
himself a pain in the ass even when he knows he's wrong.

Anyway, you could use ElGamal signatures instead, it is not patented.
The D-H and H-M patents do not cover digital signatures.

References:
- Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  - From: Wei Dai <[email protected]>
- Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
  - From: Tatu Ylonen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: "power one time pad"
Next by Date: Internet Security Review
Prev by thread: Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
Next by thread: experimental socks5 gateway
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread