[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CJR returned to sender

To: Michael Froomkin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CJR returned to sender
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 10:46:37 -0400
Cc: "Peter D. Junger" <[email protected]>, Cypherpunks <[email protected]>, Jeff Weinstein <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 Oct 1995 10:05:10 EDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Michael Froomkin writes:
> And yet people like MIT get approval for the release of PGP this way.
[...]

> If anyone from MIT is reading this, it would be a real public service to 
> put on a web site (a) what the system used for the release of PGP is 
> exactly and (b) what assurances (oral, written, names & dates) was 
> received from State/Commerce that this was legal.

I don't think they got any sort of approval from State or Commerce --
I think they just discussed it with their own lawyers.

Perry

Follow-Ups:
- FTP export walls
  - From: Mats Bergstrom <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: CJR returned to sender
  - From: Michael Froomkin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CJR returned to sender
Next by Date: e-mail, business and privicy
Prev by thread: Re: CJR returned to sender
Next by thread: FTP export walls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread