[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets

To: David Murray <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 07:40:21 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]



On Wed, 18 Oct 1995, David Murray wrote:

> B. Unilateral Anonymity. One party to the transaction is known, but the other
> is unknowable. An example might be subscribing for a digital security with
> ecash - the issuer is known, but the purchaser is anonymous.
> 
> C. Bilateral Anonymity. The identities of both parties to the transaction
> are unknowable. This might be the case on a cypherpunk stock exchange...
Or we could use the client/server terminology when possible.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
  - From: [email protected] (David Murray)

References:
- Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
  - From: [email protected] (David Murray)

Prev by Date: Re: Netscape whining virus
Next by Date: Postscript in Netscape
Prev by thread: Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
Next by thread: Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread