[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CJR returned to sender

To: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: CJR returned to sender
From: sameer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 00:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <acb323bd030210041822@[205.199.118.202]> from "Timothy C. May" at Oct 24, 95 11:35:20 pm
Sender: [email protected]

> software. However, I continue to maintain that a badly-printed barcode is
> just a joke, nothing more.)
> 

	Whether the t-shirt is a joke or not is irrelevant. If I shoot
someone, as a joke, that doesn't mean I shouldn't go to jail for it.
Unless the crypto export laws and the laws surrouding CJRs have a
provision for 'jokes', then the return of Raph's properly formed CJR
request seems to me rather, um, illegal?

	The law, in my opinion, is a joke. Does that mean I can ignore
it?

-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777
Community ConneXion				FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest")			[email protected]

References:
- Re: CJR returned to sender
  - From: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)

Prev by Date: Froomkin papers (Was: BlackNet Meets Stanford Law School)
Next by Date: Re: Hack DigiCash: Payee Anonymity
Prev by thread: Re: CJR returned to sender
Next by thread: The real value of munition t-shirts (Re: CJR returned to sender)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread