[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- To: [email protected]
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 05:59:18 -0700
- Comments: This message is NOT from the person listed in the Fromline. It is from an automated software remailing service operating atthat address.THE PORTAL SYSTEM DOES NOT CONDONE OR APPROVE OF THE CONTENTS OF THISPOSTING. Please report problem mail to <[email protected]>.
- Sender: [email protected]
>I want to see Netscape succeed, but when you hear about things like product
>being released on the net without warning those people responsible for
>supporting it, bug reports being ignored so a ship date can be made, and the
>like, it makes you really wonder. I am finding problems with 2.0b1 that
>could have been found just by using the product for a couple of days! Most
>of the problems I have seen with Netscape could be solved with better
>communications between departments within the company and some strong
>testing procedures.
>
I totally agree with this. There are an awful lot of GPFs I've been experiencing with 2.0 that I never experienced with 1.2, and I am still trying to figure out that cause. The first one happened like 5 minutes after I ran the program whilst it was loading the Netscape homepage! Another irritating one that should have been caught is the download time indicator. When I download a file, the estimated time taken is shown in hours!
These trivial problems are really quite inexcusable, and should've been caught with good quality assurance before it even went out the door.