[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal

To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
From: [email protected] (Futplex)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 18:48:39 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: [email protected] (Nym Servers Mailing List)
In-Reply-To: <acb027040402100417fa@[137.110.24.250]> from "Lance Cottrell" at Oct 22, 95 10:02:31 am
Reply-To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Sender: [email protected]

Lance Cottrell writes:
> If all nym servers were standardized to run from the same account name
> (nymserve for example) the remailers could be configured to only deliver
> final hops to addresses with that username.

A detail I missed before: the remailers used in pseudonym reply blocks must
somehow deliver replies to the True Name (verinymous ?) address of the holder
of the pseudonym. I suppose they could all finally be routed to the 
pseudonymizer, which would deliver the messages directly to the intended 
recipient (holder of the pseudonym). 

-Futplex <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
  - From: [email protected] (Lance Cottrell)

Prev by Date: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
Next by Date: Re: Internet Security Review
Prev by thread: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
Next by thread: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread