[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]

To: [email protected] (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
Subject: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
From: Laurent Demailly <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 15:25:59 +0100
Cc: [email protected] (Josh M. Osborne), [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

DOCTOR Frederick B. Cohen writes:
 > [...] uses an MD5 checksum which the members
 > of this list seem to place unlimited trust in (incorrectly in my view,
 > but that would be picking two nits with one keyboard entry).

Can you elaborate with facts on the supposed weakness of MD5 ?

[btw who talked about 'unlimited' trust ?]

dl
--
Laurent Demailly * http://hplyot.obspm.fr/~dl/ * Linux|PGP|Gnu|Tcl|...  Freedom
Prime#1: cent cinq mille cent cinq milliards cent cinq mille cent soixante sept

AK-47 PGP domestic disruption CIA cracking strategic Clinton

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  - From: [email protected] (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
- Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
  - From: [email protected] (Futplex)

References:
- Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  - From: "Josh M. Osborne" <[email protected]>
- Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
  - From: [email protected] (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)

Prev by Date: Re: How can e-cash, even on-line cleared, protect payee identity?
Next by Date: Re: Certificate proposal
Prev by thread: Re: Does your software?
Next by thread: Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread