Re: [NOISE] was Re: java security concerns

["Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>]

Peter Madden) (by way of Duncan Frissell <madden@mpi-sb.mpg.de> writes:
> The real problems lie with specifying the
> program/problem correctly in the first place (so-called specifications
> capture), and with automatic program *synthesis* from specifications
> (which, in mathematical theorem proving terms, presents the problem of
> creating existential objects, as opposed to just verifying that they
> do the right job).

Bugs in specifications are just as easy for humans to produce as bugs
in implementations, and unfortunately there is no way for our machines
to psychically intuit what it was we wanted to specify that they do
any more than we can make them intuit what it was we wanted them to
do.

Remember, by the way, that in some sense a high level programming
language *is* a specification language. Authomatic synthesis from
"specifications" is just a higher level of programming language, with
all that entails.

Perry