[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
From: sameer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 20:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Jiri Baum" at Oct 4, 95 12:18:49 pm
Pgp-Strong-Print: 3C AE E4 00 C2 6A 81 FF 49 4E EE 0C CD CD 1D 80
Sender: [email protected]

> 
> If you mention all over the place that the program is PGP-signed
> to foil {cr,h}ackers and viruses (*), chances are a lot of people will
> ask their one colleague or friend that does know PGP to verify it for them.

	Yeah, just imagine the PR possibilities!

-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777
Community ConneXion				FAX:	 510-601-9734
An Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest")			[email protected]

References:
- Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
  - From: Jiri Baum <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Keyserver keyrings
Next by Date: NYT: WWW Usage Monitoring for Marketing
Prev by thread: Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!)
Next by thread: Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread