[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: credit card conventional wisdom

To: John Pettitt <[email protected] (John Pettitt)>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: credit card conventional wisdom
From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 95 15:41:00 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Nov 95 11:30:08 PST." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


>The situation now is that in a "card not present" transaction the merchant is
>liable for the fraud.  This means that *a lot* of internet based stores are 
>getting eaten alive by fraud.

This is not quite accurate. In the US there is that distinction, in the UK
the credit card co is responsible. For that reason the requirement that
goods be delivered to the billing address _ONLY_ is strictly enforced.


>[ as an aside I've put two people in jail this year for card fraud ]

Good to hear that!

	Phill

References:
- Re: credit card conventional wisdom
  - From: John Pettitt <[email protected] (John Pettitt)>

Prev by Date: Re: credit card conventional wisdom
Next by Date: Re: Java & Netscape security [NOISE]
Prev by thread: Re: credit card conventional wisdom
Next by thread: Re: credit card conventional wisdom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread