[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re:
From: [email protected] (John Lull)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 06:03:11 GMT
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Organization: Windsmith
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Mon, 12 Feb 1996 13:41:04 -0500 (EST), Padgett wrote:

> If it were properly and legally decided that communications 
> with anon.penet.fi is against "national interest" then the sovereign has 
> not only the "right" but the *duty* to block/monitor such communications.

Bullpuckey.  One could just as legitimately say:

  "If it were properly and legally decided that publication of the
  Los Angeles Times is against "national interest" then the sovereign
  has not only the "right" but the *duty* to block such publication."

References:
- No Subject
  - From: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Working Very Carefully
Next by Date: Re:
Prev by thread: No Subject
Next by thread: Re: your mail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread