[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Patents suck
- To: cypherpunks@toad.com
- Subject: Patents suck
- From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 01:06:43 +0100
- Organization: Replay and Company UnLimited
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
- Xcomm: Replay may or may not approve of the content of this posting
- Xcomm: Report misuse of this automated service to <postmaster@REPLAY.COM>
Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada) wrote:
> Man's survival tool is his mind.
>
> Patents and copyright are establishing the ownership and protection
> the result of the exercise of his survival tool.
>
> Therefore they are good.
>
> To try to eliminate them is equivalent to promote slavery.
I take some disagreement with that.
With patents, there is a problem of large companies owning them yet
doing nothing with them except suing other companies or individuals.
For example, look at arithmetic coding: there are many patents owned
on it, yet a lot of software using this means of compression may be in
violation of the patents... are the patent-owners publishing software
or makingh efforts to license it widely? If anything, such patents
are getting in the way of using many algorithms.
Patents would be better if there was a good-faith attempt on the
part of the holder to "use it or lose it". Somebody sitting on a
patent and doing nothing with it deserves to lose it after a number
of years.