[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remailer in a box
On Thu, 9 May 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
> From: IN%"[email protected]" "Lance Cottrell" 9-MAY-1996 18:58:23.21
>
> On Thu, 9 May 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
>
> >I am not pushing the anonymous accounts until my laywer finishes the user
> >agreement for them. It is a bit of a tricky document (Sameer, want a copy
> >when it is done?). The whole site is days away from a complete redesign,
> >so I am not putting much effort into the current interface. Thanks for
> >the suggestions though.
>
> I suspect that the legal types on cypherpunks would be interested in
> seeing it. Quite welcome on the suggestions.
>
> >The >= 18 condition is to cover my butt. Since minors can not be parties
> >to contracts, I have no protection with them as clients. I am only a
> >provider for adults, and they take full responsibility for any children
> >allowed to use the connection. Fuck the CDA, but keep an eye on its claws.
>
> I see your difficulty. It is an additional one with respect to
> anonymous accounts. Hmm... you could put the burden on other ISPs by only
> having anonymous accounts via telnet access - and not accepting such from
> k12.edu domains. Bit of a limit, though.
> -Allen
>
I expect the majority of our anonymous account to be telnet. We are
setting up the contract to make it clear that any contract signed with a
minor is invalid, and that any access of our system by that individual is
actually illegal (various statutes on misuse of computer resources are
quoted).
I don't know about posting the agreement. My lawyer may not want to see all
his hard work in the public domain. I will ask.
-Lance
-------------------------------------
Lance Cottrell [email protected]
President Infonex Internet Services
http://www.Infonex.com
-------------------------------------