[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns (fwd)
On Tue, 21 May 1996, snow wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 1996, Jim Choate wrote:
> > Forwarded message:
> > > Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 15:02:08 -0700
> > > From: Hal <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: An alternative to remailer shutdowns
> > > was apparently sent through my remailer. According to 18 USC 875(c),
> > > "Whoever transmits in interstate commerce any communication containing
I don't have time to do it just now. Look in the definitions section
under "transmit" and I bet you will find language that suggests it is the
original transmitter, not innocent intermediaries, which are liable under
the statute.
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:[email protected]
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: [email protected]