[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What remains to be done.
Black Unicorn wrote:
>
> A. Methods to run secure websites on insecure servers.
>
> A thread on 'punks last month, I am of the view that local decryption of
> web pages is essential to the development of coercion free web pages.
> Estlablishing a truely secure web page today requires the server to be
> extra-terratorial, in a secure physical location, and requires such
> lengths to defeat traffic analysis (which lengths must be applied to the
> actual network logistics, rather than the software logistics) so as to be
> impractical to all but institutional resources. The best effort I have
> seen is in European Union Bank (www.eub.com) or (www.eub.net) [neither of
> which I recommend you use for deposits] and it still falls quite short.
>
> A software solution which permits local decryption makes traffic analysis
> less useful, presents the opportunity to use front end and disposable www
> pages on domestic ISPs while imposing no liability on the ISP itself, and
> opens several more effective traffic analysis deterants.
>
> Ideally, both web proxies (for servers as well as clients) and local
> decryption will be written allowing both server and user a degree of
> double blind operation as well as easy disposability of front ends.
>
> A Netscape plugin for local decryption of web pages and proxy forwarding
> of WWW form submissions to the server is a MUST.
I fully agree with all of your comments, but, encrypted proxying issues
aside, what is wrong with SSL? Is it because the encryption is for
the whole server, not individual users?
> Is anyone considering work on these?
I gave the encrypted proxy idea some thought, and intend to do
it one day. If someone is willing to run it, then I will certainly
do it. Offers?
With regard to the local decryption idea, then I don't see this as
much of a problem. How much interest is there in this? We already
have something similar running, but it would still need a bit of work
to make more general.
Gary
--
pub 1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22 Gary Howland <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = 0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D 1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06