[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What remains to be done.

To: Gary Howland <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: What remains to be done.
From: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 05:11:23 -0400 (EDT)
cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Posted-Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 05:11:23 -0400
Sender: [email protected]



On Thu, 4 Jul 1996, Gary Howland wrote:

> Black Unicorn wrote:
> > 
> > A.  Methods to run secure websites on insecure servers.

[...]

> I fully agree with all of your comments, but, encrypted proxying issues
> aside, what is wrong with SSL?  Is it because the encryption is for
> the whole server, not individual users?

It provides no protection to the individual who must run on a server he
does not have in a secure location with TEMPEST specs.

> > Is anyone considering work on these?

> With regard to the local decryption idea, then I don't see this as
> much of a problem.  How much interest is there in this?  We already
> have something similar running, but it would still need a bit of work
> to make more general.

What do you have running exactly?

> 
> Gary
> --
> pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <[email protected]>
> Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06
>

References:
- Re: What remains to be done.
  - From: Gary Howland <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CWD -- Jacking in from the "Keys to the Kingdom" Port
Next by Date: Re: What remains to be done.
Prev by thread: Re: What remains to be done.
Next by thread: Re: What remains to be done.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread