[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)

To: [email protected], Dave Banisar <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 22:11:53 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
Sender: [email protected]

Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 17-Jul-96 Intl consensus (was Re:
How.. by Dave [email protected] 
> BTW. Those wizards at Wired have gotten our favorite spook Stewart Baker 
> to write an article for an upcome issue talking about how the rest of the 
> world save Japan loves key escrow and those big bad Japanese are 
> thwarting the rest of the worlds "consensus". Its quite a load of 
> inaccurate shit but our effort to rebut it was rejected by wired (I guess 
> it wasnt trite enough for them).

Will anyone else be rebutting it?

-Declan
(not speaking for WIRED, first I heard of this)

References:
- Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)
  - From: Dave Banisar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Surf-filter lists
Next by Date: Re: US versions of Netscape now available
Prev by thread: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)
Next by thread: Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread