[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: take the pledge
>>>>> In article <v03007603ae1620074ea5@[192.187.162.15]>, David Sternlight <[email protected]> writes:
>>> Look, folks, we all know that 99% of what David Sternlight posts is
>>> garbage.
> Perry is notorious for posting garbage and the above mote in his own eye is
> a prime example. 99%? Let's see some data and specifics. I'm always willing
> to discuss substantive disagreements, presented civilly.
> It's pathetic that Perry, can't even make a rational counter-argument but
> has to resort to unsupported defamation.
>> Why don't we all pledge not to answer any of his posts, and
>> then he'll go away.
> Nobody compels you to answer any of my posts. Calling for a "pledge" and an
> organized boycott suggests you are afraid people won't agree with you
> without trying to make it "politically correct" to do what YOU want. Some
> freedom-lover you are.
> The truth is none of my points have been refuted by you, and being unable
> to deal with rational critical comment, you resort to this.
> Go for it. I won't mind, and the noise level will go way down, especially
> among the defamers, who don't respond with much substance anyway.
Sheesh. Count me in on the pledge. Note that he _still_ hasn't
responded to the call for him to actually _START_ a thread.
-Robin
PS: He is the first _person_ ever to make my kill file for anything.
_Subjects_, yes, _people_ no. However, there were 600 new cypherpunks
messages over the last three days, and he seems to be way too much of
it.
I DON'T LIKE SPAM!