[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A Libertine Question
[email protected] wrote:
> As is the observable phenomenon that some people focus on the details
> and miss the point. You may also consider this to be a moral judgement.
I'm sorry, but this thread is making no sense.
You wondered aloud why Tim would make moral judgements; I claim he
didn't. What exactly was it you were trying to say?
> To argue that the cited examples - out of the universe of possible
> examples -
- that you clearly have in stock as ready-to-use straw men -
> did not imply a moral judgement is an argument useful only for its
> humour.
So you're saying that you made a response to Tim questioning his use
of moral judgements just to introduce your own moral judgement?
If you want to issue moral pronouncements ex cathedra, why not just start
a new thread instead of couching them in a confusing response?
______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX * For the time being,
[email protected] * [email protected] *
<URL:http://www.io.com/~m101> * three heads and eight arms.