[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [WAS xs4all.nl] Terrorists
At 02:29 PM 9/9/96 -0400, Duncan Frissell wrote:
>At 01:49 AM 9/9/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>>And the net effect of crypto anarchy is to destabilize and marginalize
>>central governments, which is a net positive effect. If some eggs get
>>broken in the process, the biological imperative will generate more eggs.
>>No big deal.
>Particularly since governments murdered 160 million in the last 100 years
>while we civilians have only managed to murder a paltry 20 million or fewer.
>A savings of 160 million deaths leaves a lot of room for a non-harmful
>increase in private murder. We could increase the private murder rate by 8
>to 10 times and still break even.
I think the analysis is even more attractive than these numbers would imply.
Probably the victims of government were, on average, no more "worthy of
death" than that of the average citizen. They were the soldiers killed in
wars (many or most of whom were drafted), civilians bombed, the victims of
oppression and holocaust, etc. More or less ordinary people, a
cross-section of society.
While it's harder to generalize about victims of private killing, probably a
far higher probability were either the bad guys killed off by other bad
guys, or the bad guys killed legitimately by the good guys. Even when they
were "good guys killed by bad guys," in many cases it's due to fallout from
drug laws, or people prevented from carrying guns for their own protection.
>Note too that most terrorism is aimed at governments (even if practiced on
>civilians). In the absence of government, terrorist incentives may be
Normally efforts to reduce terrorism would be welcomed by the government.
Wouldn't it be interesting to see their reaction to an organization which
announces that there are too many innocent citizens who are becoming victims
of terrorism, and publicly calls on these terrorists to direct their attacks
to non-private individuals, possibly researching the matter and giving
I think the public would understand, after a little education, that the
average terrorist doesn't really have any reason to want to kill a private
citizen if a better alternative were presented. I don't suppose you'd ever
see a conventional polling organization ask the public questions like,
"would you prefer to see 200+ randomly-selected citizens die in an airplane
bombing, or the deaths of 50 government employees most responsible for the
Waco and Ruby Ridge incidents."