[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DL in exchange for fingerprint
At 12:23 PM 9/19/96, Jeff Barber wrote:
>Oh joy. You no longer need to be arrested to get fingerprinted
>in Georgia. On the front page of Wednesday's Atlanta Journal, under
>the headline "Now you can get driver's license in minutes":
>Just what I would have called it: a great idea. Is it true that 31
>other states take your fingerprint as part of the license application?
>I feel sick.
California has it, so that's what about 20 million drivers have to put up
with. I'd expect all the states to have this within a few years.
(Yes, I disliked being thumb-printed, but I could see no viable
alternative. I'm sure Duncan has some scheme to declare himself a Botswanan
exchange student, but I decided being thumb-printed was the lesser hassle.)
By the way, the next rev of the California driver's license will reportedly
have one's *Social Security Number* printed on the card! So much for the
statement clearly printed on my card:
"For social security and tax purposes -- not for identification."
Paraphrasing that famous quote, just which part of "not for identification"
don't they understand?
(Indeed, I am asked for my SSN in many places. A few times I've refused to
give it. Once the clerk just said, "Fine, I have it here on my computer
anyway." Refusing to give it is probably no longer meaningful, due to
massively cross-linked data bases.)
Again, we desperately need an infrastructure of "credentials without identity."
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed.
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
[email protected] 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1,257,787-1 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."