Re: Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News

[Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>]

Omegaman wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I understand this. It's quite obvious; being removed from the
> > subscriber list hasn't slowed Vulis at all. When I was writing the piece
> > Vulis seemed to have slowed his ad hominem attacks and instead was talking
> > about censorship (something that is within the charter of the list), but
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Actually, Declan, it's not.  "info cypherpunks" in the body of a message to
> majordomo@toad.com yields the welcome message to the list -- the closest
> thing to a charter available.  The subjects of censorship and free speech
> are neither mentioned nor alluded to anywhere within that document.

This is true.

Declan's "fight-censorship" list, though, is supposed to be about censorship,
and he's allowing no criticism of his positions there.

-rich