[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News
Rich Graves <[email protected]> writes:
> Omegaman wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, I understand this. It's quite obvious; being removed from the
> > > subscriber list hasn't slowed Vulis at all. When I was writing the piece
> > > Vulis seemed to have slowed his ad hominem attacks and instead was talkin
> > > about censorship (something that is within the charter of the list), but
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > Actually, Declan, it's not. "info cypherpunks" in the body of a message to
> > [email protected] yields the welcome message to the list -- the closest
> > thing to a charter available. The subjects of censorship and free speech
> > are neither mentioned nor alluded to anywhere within that document.
>
> This is true.
>
> Declan's "fight-censorship" list, though, is supposed to be about censorship,
> and he's allowing no criticism of his positions there.
He's exercising his property rights at the expense of his credibility.
---
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps