[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why Cryptography is harder than it looks?

To: Brent Cunningham <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Why Cryptography is harder than it looks?
From: C Matthew Curtin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 07:52:03 -0500
Cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <c=CA%a=_%p=NorTel_Secure_Ne%[email protected]>
References: <c=CA%a=_%p=NorTel_Secure_Ne%[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

>>>>> "Brent" == Brent Cunningham <[email protected]> writes:

Brent> Can you please either: 1) email me a copy; or 2) give me a
Brent> pointer as to where I can get a copy; of Bruce Schneier's paper
Brent> on "Why Cryptography is harder than it looks?"

http://www.counterpane.com/whycrypto.html

-- 
Matt Curtin  [email protected]  Megasoft, Inc   Chief Scientist
http://www.research.megasoft.com/people/cmcurtin/   I speak only for myself.
Hacker Security Firewall Crypto PGP Privacy Unix Perl Java Internet Intranet

References:
- Why Cryptography is harder than it looks?
  - From: Brent Cunningham <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Addendum
Next by Date: Pronunciation of the "name" "logos" [Was: Re: Politeness]
Prev by thread: Re: Why Cryptography is harder than it looks?
Next by thread: [crypto] Avatar Protection?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread