[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ira Magaziner: FREE Internet
Yeah, I read the report from Magaziner's task force. Don't be taken in by
the CNN story. The news on crypto is not as good as it sounds; far from
it.
Hold the applause. Read the report for yourself.
-Declan
(Jacking in from Kuala Lumpur.)
On Fri, 6 Dec 1996 [email protected] wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Just posted an hour ago on CNN
>
> I don't believe it! Ira Magaziner's interagency task for recommended
> that the Internet be a free zone, duty free, and to try and persuade
> all countries not to limit speech, encryption, etc. two days in a
> row: first the SPA changed course and really balked, and now this
> from an ultra-liberal! maybe there is such a thing as a spark of
> freedom in the gathering darkness!
>
> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/TECH/9612/05/clinton.internet.reut/index.html">
> Ira Magaziner Task force recommends Free Zone Internet </a>
>
> ===CNN post follows===
>
> <html><head><title> Magaziner recommends Free Internet </a></title></head>
> <body>
> <H1>Clinton advisers urge free market approach for Internet</H1>
> December 5, 1996<BR>
> Web posted at: 10:30 p.m. EST
>
> <P>
> WASHINGTON (Reuter) -- The Internet could provide a huge
> boost to the U.S. economy if the federal government pursues
> "free market" policies in cyberspace, a group of President
> Clinton's top advisers said in a draft report obtained by
> Reuters.<P>
>
> The group, an interagency task force headed by senior
> presidential adviser Ira Magaziner, recommended the
> administration work globally to protect the Internet from new
> taxes, censorship and other onerous forms of regulation.<P>
>
> After seven months of deliberations, the task force is
> preparing to issue for public comment a report of principles and
> policies the Unites States should pursue, Magaziner said in an
> interview. <P>
>
> "One of the things we're trying to do with this paper is as
> much say what government should not do as say what they should
> do," Magaziner said."A lot of what industry is concerned
> about is that governments are already beginning to take actions
> around the world that would inhibit commerce."<P>
>
> The growth of Internet commerce could help boost U.S.
> exports of everything from movies and news to software and
> consulting services. Exports of such products totaled $40
> billion in 1995, the draft report noted.<P>
>
> The idea is to hitch U.S. exports to the speeding Internet
> commerce train. Sales of goods and services online are projected
> to grow to $7 billion in the year 2000, from about $1 billion
> this year, according to market researchers at Jupiter
> Communications.<P>
>
> "Companies have told us there would be a tremendous
> potential to increase world trade across the Internet if we
> could provide the right kind of environment," Magaziner said.<P>
>
> The draft report, called "A Framework for Global Electronic
> Commerce," covers nine issues, from taxation and customs to
> privacy and security. <P>
>
> On taxation, the draft report echoes a report issued by the
> Treasury Department last month by stating no new taxes should be
> imposed. Acting through the World Trade Organization,the United
> States should push for the Internet to be designated a duty-free
> zone, the draft said.<P>
>
> Some consumers worry their privacy will be violated
> when they shop online. he report said governments should push
> vendors to disclose what will be done with information about
> consumers rather than dictate to merchants what they can or
> cannot do with the data. <P>
>
> On some issues, such as encryption -- encoding information
> in a scrambled format to provide a measure of security or
> privacy -- existing administration policies may be seen as
> conflicting with the free market approach of the draft report.
> <P>
>
> Copyright 1996
> <a href="http:/www.ccn.com/interactive_legal.html#Reuters">
> Reuters Limited </a>. All rights reserved.
> </body></html>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3i
> Charset: latin1
> Comment: Encrypted with 2.6.3i. Requires 2.6 or later.
>
> iQCVAwUBMqewuL04kQrCC2kFAQH7eAP+L4Fk1sZgMl/YhufgluegE5Xo7nCvSJ8u
> rqhgBGmvE1/rY1HacDFt/4a9SgXkEfNPohkQoGnFccx1jhgZpBKbx8SQrIPPboHh
> Indv5MJbvcdGYfTR0UKms1t0iCv0DiQgtyXMxvHWFVTzByaKLu4cuEgatlSmsIoK
> SfRT376DqLg=
> =SSQB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
// [email protected] // I do not represent the EFF // [email protected] //