[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Microsoft IE may not work without censorship files
Rich writes:
> > It's good to see they make at least an attempt at preventing the
> > PICS filter from being turned off without a password.
>
> True, but my point was stronger.
>
> The program *will not work* if there have been even inadvertent changes
> to the self-censorship files. This person emailed me because he couldn't
> get it to work after an unrelated change.
My original response was really just meant as humor. (The other
paragraph in particular.) I'm of the school that ratings are a
profoundly useless idea for their supposed purpose, and dangerous
in their possible misuse by the government.
> This sort of contradicts Microsoft's claims that they don't require
> ratings because they're turned off by default. If the file can't fix
> itself, I'd say that's not "default."
If a user randomly deletes parts of an application and it stops
working I'm afraid the fault is entirely with the user. Reinstalling
the damaged software would seem the obvious answer.
> Sorry, I didn't get the context across. Read it again alongside this:
>
> http://pathfinder.com/Netly/daily/961213.html
That article say in part, "Microsoft has indicated that future
generations may well come out of the box with RSAC-i, by
default, activated." I follow Microsoft's strategy and
announcements very closely and as far as I can tell this is
sheer fabrication. The closest thing they've announced (and
shipped) is the IE Admin Kit that lets a corporation build
a custom version of IE with the settings to their liking. I can't
find any fault with that.
regards
-Blake (who's played apologist to Rich's MS-bashing before)