[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clipper plans 4 sale
At 04:18 PM 12/24/96 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
> Many people will believe it. Its easy to construct the case
>that the ITARs, as they apply to things in the public domain, thing
>implemented outside the US, things designed outside the US, are just
>silly. Its much harder to make that argument about Skipjack,
>especially as you can't legally export the chips.
When Clipper was first proposed, in April of 1993, as I recall one of the
government-types promoting it claimed that it would be exportable "except to
terrorist-sponsoring countries like Libya."
This made me laugh: It seemed to me that if Clipper codes were kept and
available to the US government, you'd expect that they'd WANT Libya to get
those phones! In fact, they'd air-drop them in the thousands, right? After
all, this would make other countries more dependant on the US for
cooperation, and they'd be more pliable as a result, right?
Jim Bell
[email protected]