[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary

To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 21:39:01 -0800
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
Organization: TOTO Enterprises
References: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970111161943.5104E-100000@polaris>
Reply-To: toto@sk.sympatico.ca
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com

> On Sat, 11 Jan 1997 DataETRsch@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > Questions, queries, or comments ("gulp")? E-Mail: DataETRsch@aol.com,
> > JKYuRamos@aol.com, or DataETResearch@geocities.com. Note: From now on, any
> > messages to DataET Research that do not contain the text "NO FLAME" somewhere
> > in the subject heading will be ignored completely. If a message is a indeed
> > flame, the associated server's administrator will be contacted, and a
> > complaint will be filed accordingly.

  Have they hired Sandy to moderate 'their' incoming email, too?
  It seems like moderating CypherPunk responses is becoming a cottage
industry.

References:
- Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
  - From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Prev by Date: apology
Next by Date: Re: Private Idaho source code now available
Prev by thread: Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
Next by thread: Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread