Re: remailer spam throttle

[dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)]

Hal Finney <hal@rain.org> writes:
> For example, one idea is to have a list of people who are willing to
> receive anonymous mail without questions.  It could be that the remailer
> is set up to ask before sending mail normally, but to people on such a
> list it doesn't have to ask, it just sends it, because they have given
> permission.
>
> Some people have objected to this proposal because the existence of the
> list might give a hint about which people send mail through the remailers.
> Even though the list is of people willing to *receive* anonymous mail,
> it could well be that there is a strong correlation with people who want
> to send such mail.

Instead of keeping this list in cleartext, one could keep 1-way hashes
of the addresses. Thus a remailer (or anyone) can check whether a given
address is on the list, but they can't just go through the list and
"investigate" the addresses on it.

---

<a href="mailto:dlv@bwalk.dm.com">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps