[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Information Systems Security Board
"John Young" <[email protected]> wrote in article <[email protected]>...
> On December 13, 1996, representatives from The National
> Information Infrastructure (NII) Task Force of The President's
> National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee
> (NSTAC) held a meeting at Steptoe & Johnson in Washington, D.C.
> to discuss industry interest in developing an industry-run
> Information Systems Security Board (ISSB).
>
> Stewart Baker of Steptoe & Johnson discussed the antitrust laws
> and their application to the meeting, with particular emphasis on
> the need to avoid discussion of competitive conditions and to show
> openness to all interested participants.
I would consider such a proposal from Suart Baker to involve an unfortunate conflict of interest. As one of the people who makes his living as a fixer enabling people to comply with the export control laws he does not have an interest in pressing for reform of the anti-crypto regulations that stop computer security sdystems being used.
He is like the owner of a NYC taxi medallion. His 'property' has no legitimate value but he has an interest to continue the legal distortions that keep it in place.
Phill