Re: FCPUNX:Advocating Violence

[jamesd@echeque.com]

At 03:29 PM 4/13/97 -0800, Jim Bell wrote:
> Looked at traditionally, "we" have a
> military because "they" have militaries.  There appears to be no way out of
> this game, and thus in that context militaries could be viewed as a public
> good, or at least a public necessity.  But give the public a relatively easy
> option to exit this game, and that public good becomes a public evil.
> Naturally, it doesn't appear that way to the people who profit from such
> waste:  Government officials and employees, etc.

Area defence is a public good, and therefore can only 
be paid for by charity or by coercion.

Retribution, however is an excludable good.  Therefore it can 
be paid for by normal market mechanisms.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com