[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Disinformation in L.A.

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Disinformation in L.A.
From: Tom Allard <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 09:28:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 May 1997 01:07:01 PDT." <[email protected]>
Organization: Federal Reserve B.O.G.
Sender: [email protected]


>   Didn't her boss's murderer walk on the charge by using the defence
> that he ate too many Twinkies?
>   No political intrigue here...

That was the defense, yes.  Dan White was a former cop and treated like a 
hero by fellow cops.  The prosecution never really challenged the Twinkie 
defense, nor did they bring up politics or homophobia as motives.  With a 
prosecution like that, who needs a defense?

rgds-- TA  ([email protected])
I don't speak for the Federal Reserve Board, it doesn't speak for me.
pgp fingerprint: 10 49 F5 24 F1 D9 A7 D6  DE 14 25 C8 C0 E2 57 9D

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disinformation in L.A.
  - From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Disinformation in L.A.
  - From: [email protected] (Huge Cajones Remailer)

Prev by Date: Re: Disinformation in L.A.
Next by Date: Re: Spectre disapproves of remailers and anonmyity
Prev by thread: Re: Disinformation in L.A.
Next by thread: Re: Disinformation in L.A.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread