Re: Jim Bell 6

["Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>]

John Young <jya@pipeline.com> writes:
       
> On June 26 the court handling Jim's case extended
> the time from June 30 to July 11 for the USA to file an 
> indictment.
> 
> This is from an on-line docket of the case via 
> Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER)
> a subcription service for federal courts.
> 
> No indication that Jim has been released, jailed since 
> his arrest on May 16. No reason given for repeated
> waiver of right to a speedy trial.
> 
> The docket's at:
> 
>    http://jya.com/jimbell-dock.htm

Thanks for keeping us up to date. Jim always seemed to
me to be a loony, but I never (and still don't) think
he's capable of the things the warrent alleges him to
have been planning.

Peter Trei
DISCLAIMER: The above is my opinion, no one else's.