[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
More on crypto from Bonn
Another story in today's FINANCIAL TIMES
http://www.FT.com
describes a "clash" between USCommerce Sec'y Daley and German economic
minister Rexrodt on strong crypto. Because the speakers' choices of words
are interesting, I quote from the FT article by Ralph Atkins:
On coding technology, however, Mr Daley insisted,
"there are certain
legitimate areas where governments have to be involved".
Encryption
should be used to protect credit card numbers or
detailed contracts from
being read. But, he went on: "We must also make sure
national security is
safeguarded by applying those rules sensibly, so that
potential terrorists or
other sophisticated criminals cannot hide their work."
Mr Rexrodt hinted the European ministers regarded US
policy on
exporting encryption technology as discriminatory.
He backed "strong" encryption procedures, which he said
were "offering
users the only protection that they have, the only
certainty, that their data is
not going to be divulged or misused on open networks".
Mr Rexrodt was backed by Mr Ron Sommer, chairman of
Deutsche
Telekom, Europe's largest telecommunications group, who
said: "Anyone
who uses the point of public security as an argument in
this [encryption]
issue has not realised or acknowledged that any such
legal requirements
stand in the way of the further spread of electronic
commerce."
Questions for the reader:
What's a "potential" terrorist? (Is the occasional apparent c'punx
paranoia justified?)
How is the US export policy discriminatory?
Why is DT coming out on this issue? Who are their strategic
partners for ecommerce among US telecomms? (I'll have to ask around about
that ...)
cheers
.........................................
Donald Weightman
[email protected]