[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HISTORY - pre-CDA, "compromise", untrue civil-liberties groups (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <[email protected]>, on 07/17/97
at 05:51 PM, Declan McCullagh <[email protected]> said:
Declan,
I sniped this from your forwarded post:
>White 1995 White House 1997
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Content Regulations imposed No content regulations, no law
>by Congress on all Internet or regulation of Net, no
>requiement Publishers. to label or rate
>content.
>Criminal Penalties for No criminal penalties for
>anything display of Harmful To besides trafficing in
>child Minors Material w/o good pornography, obscenity
>or faith effort to block stalking kids online
>(illegal before kids access CDA)
Do you have any docs or transcripts from the meeting with the White House?
What is being claimed above about the current proposal and what I ahve
been hearing here are two differnet things. It was my understnding that
the current proposal was very much like the White proposal in '95.
Any clairifcation you can provide on this matter would be appreciated.
Thanks,
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBM86PuI9Co1n+aLhhAQGs9wP/RPNSdQxvRvWgThjPGWG6wbS0m4wyjaPz
K1psZ+UZwsng3htjbo9KF023NfQMJo4+soQk7UkZiD8du4WejBQWA6epGmM6/MB7
12FwSwnRz0EmruUrC7sGYq3TcG2f3DP2mEF5znQjcCYKnbn0nmcYFpSQJc+Hy/nR
gcVOqvaW4gI=
=C+sN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----