[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)

To: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
From: Bill Frantz <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 21:04:56 -0700
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


At 9:18 AM -0700 7/25/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>RSAC-PS raises the same troubling questions as RSACnews: what is a "public
>service" group? Who decides?

This question is easy to answer.  By being publicly available, they are ALL
offering public services.  Therefore they are all free from
mandatory/voluntary ratings.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The Internet was designed  | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | to protect the free world  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
[email protected] | from hostile governments.  | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
  - From: Lucky Green <[email protected]>
- Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
  - From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>

References:
- CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
  - From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: An Attempt to Hobble SAFE Crypto Bill
Next by Date: Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
Prev by thread: Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
Next by thread: Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread