[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSA leak (fwd)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
From: Harry Tuttle Remailer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 02:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Comments: This message did not originate from the address above. It was remailed by an anonymous remailing service. If you have questions or complaints, please direct them to <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


On Sun, Jul 27, 1997 at 11:46:00PM -0000, Secret Squirrel wrote:
> Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
> 
> Ian Goldberg <[email protected]> writes:
> > 2. Their cracker changes the state of 2^128 bits in 33 minutes.  This is
> >    being extremely generous;
> 
> >                          (Actually, for all I know, terawatt power sources
> >    may exist; that's out of my field.  Please let me know if this is the case.
> 
> 
> Not within a few million miles of here, and they'd be hard to conceal.
> 
> A few GW is fairly easy, by several methods.

Terawatts for a few microseconds is fairly standard technology, I 
believe.  Femtosecond laser pulses driven by *very* large capacitor 
banks... 

> Terrestrial fusion is not a serious contender yet, and I doubt
> it will be for a long time.

It's easy to generate lots of power through fusion.  The problem is 
confinement.

References:
- Re: NSA leak (fwd)
  - From: Secret Squirrel <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: NSA leak magic
Next by Date: Re: New Crypto Application
Prev by thread: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread