Re: "What is your strategy to avoid RSACi type systems?"

[Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>      Why label it then?  I won't.  I think people should resist labels
>>on text.  99 percent of the concerns over web pages has to do with
>>graphics..... I would suggest dealing with the most obvious and
>>legitimate complains, but drawing a line where it made sense too.
>
>I wasn't saying I planned to label my writings. I was making the point that
>if "crap" and "consequences" (such as the law enforcement actions and
>legislation you yourself mention above) befall those who mislabel their
>sites, then surely this will not be confined to images alone. The "fisting
>and pissing" stuff you cited in another message will be equally unsuitable
>for children--many will claim--even if it is in the form of stories,
>attempts to recruit, etc.

Censorware naturally targets words rather than pictures because it is easier 
to write software that indexes and classifies words than it is to write image 
recognition software.  Language is actually blocked *more* than pictures 
since the programs themselves contain software to block forbidden words even 
on sites that have not been put on the censorware block list.

Jake Baker spent 30 days in stir for a text-only post.

DCF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM90Ct4VO4r4sgSPhAQGslwP+IzKsUEikXAnzfFAm6Y0Xw2Zvf7ogexXg
Ki1xQ0zUj28kZVIX0i/HDdr0dJVLoi5dwxXvLZPZ1jokQYVnUNPrTyW7jAEpFPS8
G4Bfa+wzMhgXpcbEBtlzHzN50owHJ/ZHb55Xczy0b7kDF8HbSfnH593klaWEALQl
OVDZ49hwJNo=
=1iQs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----