[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)

To: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
From: Paul Bradley <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 17:51:30 +0000 ( )
cc: James Love <[email protected]>, Tim May <[email protected]>, "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]



> It generally is not morally wrong to take steps to prevent children from
> having access to pornography, provided they're your children or you have a
> custodial relationship. 

I used to be of broadly this opinion, and still am conviced it is so, 
However, I think we have to separate saying something is not morally 
wrong from encouraging it, I believe parents may censor their childrens 
access to information as they see fit, but I don`t think they should.

        Datacomms Technologies data security
       Paul Bradley, [email protected]
  [email protected], [email protected]    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

References:
- Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
  - From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Spam is Information?
Next by Date: Re: Authors Wanted
Prev by thread: Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
Next by thread: Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread