[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE

To: Carl Ellison <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
From: Ben Cox <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 17:24:39 -0400
Cc: Greg Broiles <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


Carl Ellison says:
>>Decisions made by the Secretary of Commerce with the concurrence of the
>>Secretary of Defense with respect to exports of encryption products under
>>this section shall not be subject to judicial review.
>
>I take it this last sentence is intended to kill Bernstein, Karn and Junger
>and any other cases we might try to bring.  Correct?

How could that possibly be binding?  Anything the court system thinks is
subject to judicial review is subject to judicial review.

-- Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>

References:
- National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
  - From: Greg Broiles <[email protected]>
- Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
  - From: Carl Ellison <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Telephone bugging devices
Next by Date: Biological Warfare
Prev by thread: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
Next by thread: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread