[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE

To: Ben Cox <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 18:01:58 -0400 (EDT)
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v03110709b045fae56b41@[158.98.7.94]>
Sender: [email protected]




On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Ben Cox wrote:

> >I take it this last sentence is intended to kill Bernstein, Karn and Junger
> >and any other cases we might try to bring.  Correct?
> 
> How could that possibly be binding?  Anything the court system thinks is
> subject to judicial review is subject to judicial review.

Didn't Patel rule late last year that that sort of restriction was
nonsense?

References:
- Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
  - From: Ben Cox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: LACC: DEA Agents Accuse CIA of Tapping Phones
Next by Date: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
Prev by thread: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
Next by thread: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread