[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CDA protects against liability
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> At 13:46 -0400 10/2/97, Anonymous wrote:
> >Another case where the CDA protected against liability. Remailer ops
> >should look into this.
> >
> >http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/7361.html:
This remailer-op, while not previously aware of the case, is well-aware of
that provision of the CDA, but has not yet had the need or opportunity to
use it as a legal defense. The reference is Public Law 104-104, Title V,
Subtitle A, Sec. 502 as it amends (47 U.S.C. 223). The text of this law is
available on-line at:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c104:S.652.ENR:
My interpretation of this is: Anonymous remailers are internet service
providers.
--
For information on this anonymous remailing system, send the subject
"remailer-help" to <[email protected]> or visit our web pages at
http://anon.efga.org/anon/. To contact the operator directly, send mail
to <[email protected]>. For general information and discussion about
anonymous remailers, send a message with "subscribe" in the body to
<[email protected]>.