[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CDA protects against liability

To: Anonymous <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CDA protects against liability
From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 15:33:31 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Remember that the CDA "protects against liability" since the online
services cut a deal during the legislative process.

In other words AOL & co lobbied to have provisions inserted to get them off
the hook, even though individual users would still be screwed when the act
became law.

Another case of corporations selling out civil liberties.

-Declan

At 13:46 -0400 10/2/97, Anonymous wrote:
>Another case where the CDA protected against liability.  Remailer ops
>should look into this.
>
>http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/7361.html:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CDA protects against liability
  - From: Georgia Cracker Remailer Administrator <[email protected]>
- Re: CDA protects against liability
  - From: [email protected] (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

References:
- CDA protects against liability
  - From: Anonymous <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Request for illegal electronic surveillance examples and cases
Next by Date: NoneRe: Remailers and ecash (fwd)
Prev by thread: CDA protects against liability
Next by thread: Re: CDA protects against liability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread