[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stronghold
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Stronghold
- From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
- Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 12:46:09 -0400
- Comments: This message was remailed by a FREE automatedremailing service. For additional information on this service,send a message with the subject "remailer-help" [email protected]. The body of the message will bediscarded. To report abuse, contact the operator [email protected]. Headers below this point wereinserted by the original sender.
- Sender: [email protected]
Anonymous wrote:
| C2 is obviously deperate to suppress the information that's already
known to
| an increasing number of people in the field. Their threats against
Vulis may
| be one of the reasons why none of the security experts, who confirmed
the
| presense of serious security flaws in Stronghold, are saying much
about this.
The information regarding the security flaws in Stronghold comes at a
pretty dear price currently. With the increasing value of this type of
information in the corporate underworld, the bugs and backdoors in
security software that are revealed to the world make up only a small
portion of those that are known to exist by those who have the funds
to purchase them.
For every free spirit who publishes a security flaw, there are a dozen
enterpreneurs who recognize the value of the information they hold.
MoneyMonger