[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress

To: Bill Stewart <[email protected]>, "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>, Eli Brandt <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Barbara Simons" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress
From: "Attila T. Hun" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 97 15:31:29 +0000
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
No-Archive: NoArchive
Organization: old folks home for unpenitent hackers; no crackers!
Owner: Attila T. Hun <[email protected]>
Reply-to: "Attila T. Hun" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


on or about 971015:1952 
    Bill Stewart <[email protected]> was purported to have 
    expostulated to perpetuate an opinion:

#Multiple small points of failure mean that it's less likely
#that the official who wants to rip off information has access
#to the set of information he wants to rip off.  You could argue
#that there would be more officials with access, but probably not, since a big
#pile of information is something that attracts officials far faster than
#little boring piles.

    TRUER WORDS WERE NEVER SPOKEN!

        attila


 "attila" sig: 1024/C20B6905/23D0 FA7F 6A8F 6066 BCAF AE56 98C0 D7B0

References:
- Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress
  - From: Bill Stewart <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Import restrictions for crypto code
Next by Date: Re: what can we do about PGP sell out and CMR?
Prev by thread: Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress
Next by thread: Security flaws introduced by "other readers" in CMR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread